













Questionnaire
Did you enjoy the film?
YES
Which areas influenced your decision?
. . . It was different
What improvements could be made?
. . . .acting skills and dialogue, (storyline maybe?)
Did you understand the plot?
NO
Could you tell that it was a parody?
Of what?
Where could you see this being shown?
On a laptop, you tube?
If this was a series, would you watch the next episode?
YES
Might help me understand it
Thanks for your time.
Your welcome.
(Age: 22)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Questionnaire
Did you enjoy the film?
YES NO
Which areas influenced your decision?
The fact it was a comedy parody made it interesting and funny to watch.
What improvements could be made?
Clearer speaking from the actors
Did you understand the plot?
YES NO
Could you tell that it was a parody?
Yes
Where could you see this being shown?
In a film festival or on a television programme
If this was a series, would you watch the next episode?
YES NO Maybe
Depends on the quirky lines and plot story.
Thanks for your time.
(Age 15)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With these two, there was a vast difference between the responses. The 15 year old had rather positive responses, saying that while it lacked 'clever lines' it was still enjoyable. The 22 year old was less positive. There was no understanding of the parody and the acting was highlighted as the key problem in the peice. The positive was that if it was a series, the next episode would be watched - but to help understand the storyline. All in all it was mixed when it came to the questionaires, which was interesting. It will be great to be able to look over Laurens findings and summerising it in my Exciting 'prezi' Evaluation. Will be posting the link very soon

Obviously some of this is difficult to see because of the quality of picture but I took key elements of the empire layout (Look Closer - Using actual film facts from our film , Caption on the image that has a thinnly veiled joke, large quotation from the review, star rating, and some of the smaller graphics I attempted to recreate (red/ orange bar , small circle with arrow in it at the start and end of the review ). I put my own spin on the overview mast head (In Cinemas) and changed it to On Line as our film is intended to be a low budget internet based film. I also included the website and page numbers on the base of the page.
Initially my draft was critised due to the uneven textbox sizes and the fact the default size (A4) isnt actually the size of normal magazines as they are normally wider and slightly shorter. After a quick refresher of publishers features (my year 11 gcse ict teacher must be weeping!) i remembered most of the key tools at would rectify the criticism originally got. After all this it looked much improved. I would say that I learnt from my feedback and maybe next time i should do more research on magazines before making my first draft to adhere more to conventions.
.jpg)